Abstract
A source apportionment study was carried out to estimate the contribution of motor vehicles to ambient particulate matter (PM) in selected urban areas in the USA. Measurements were performed at seven locations during the period September 7, 2000 through March 9, 2001. Measurements included integrated PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Ambient PM2.5 and PM10 were apportioned to their local sources using the chemical mass balance (CMB) receptor model and compared with results obtained using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results indicate that PM2.5 components were mainly from combustion sources, including motor vehicles, and secondary species (nitrates and sulfates). PM10 consisted mainly of geological material, in addition to emissions from combustion sources. The fractional contributions of motor vehicles to ambient PM were estimated to be in the range from 20 to 76% and from 35 to 92% for PM2.5 and PM10, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chan, T., & Lippmann, M. (1977). Particle collection efficiencies of air sampling cyclones: An empirical theory. Environmental Science and Technology, 11, 377–382.
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Pritchett, L., Pierson, W., Frazier, C., & Purcell, R. (1993). The DRI thermal/optical carbon analysis system: Description, evaluation, and applications in U.S. air quality studies. Atmospheric Environment, 27A, 1185–1202.
Fujita, E., Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., Robinson, N. F., Willard, L. R., & Kumar, N. (1998). Northern Front Range air quality study, Final report for Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Hildemann, L. M., Markowski, G. R., & Cass, G. R. (1991). Chemical composition of emissions from urban sources of fine organic aerosol. Environmental Science and Technology, 25, 744–759.
Mamane, Y., Gillies, J. A., Connor, C. M. O., & Gertler, A. W. (1998). Distinguishing among fugitive dust emission sources using scanning electron microscopy, X-ray fluorescence, and instrumental neutron activation analysis. Final Report prepared by the Desert Research Institute for Washoe County District Health Department, Reno, NV, June 22, 1998.
Pace, T. G., & Watson, J. G. (1987). Protocol for applying and validating the CMB model. EPA 450/4-87-010. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: US Environmental Protection Agency.
Rogge, W. F., Hildemann, L. M., Mazurek, M. A., & Cass, G. R. (1993). Sources of fine organic aerosol. 3. Road dust, tire debris, and organometallic brake lining dust: Roads as source and sinks. Environmental Science and Technology, 27, 1892–1904.
Watson, J. G., & Chow, J. C. (1993). Ambient air sampling. In K. Willeke & P. Baron (Eds.), Aerosol measurement: Principles, techniques and applications, (pp. 622–639). New York, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., Lu, Z., Fujita, E. M., Lowenthal, D. H., Lawson, D. R., et al. (1994). Chemical mass balance source apportionment of PM10 during the southern California air quality study. Aerosol Science and Technology, 21, 1–36.
Watson, J. G., Cooper, J. A., & Huntzicker, J. J. (1984). The effective variance weighting for least squares calculations applied to the mass balance receptor model. Atmospheric Environment, 18, 1347–1355.
Zielinska, B., McDonald, J., Hayes, T., Chow, J. C., Fujita, E. M., & Watson, J. G. (1998). Northern Front Range air quality study: Volume B: Source measurements. Report prepared by Desert Research Institute for Colorado State University, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abu-Allaban, M., Gillies, J.A., Gertler, A.W. et al. Motor Vehicle Contributions to Ambient PM10 and PM2.5 at Selected Urban Areas in the USA. Environ Monit Assess 132, 155–163 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9511-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9511-3